[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53F7FCF3.4000800@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:31:15 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
"a-jacquiot@...com" <a-jacquiot@...com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: Kconfig: Let all little endian architectures
define CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN explicitly
On 8/22/14 19:09, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 13.8.2014 10:03, Geert Uytterhoeven napsal(a):
>> CC kbuild
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> index c49a775..0510a5d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
>>> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES
>>> def_bool y
>>>
>>> +config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>>> + depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
>>> + def_bool y
>>> +
>>> +
>>> config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
>>> bool
>>
>> As this is a common symbol, and replicated for all affected architectures,
>> I'm wondering if we should have the "config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN" in
>> common Kconfig code instead, and make the individual architectures do a
>> "select CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN"?
>
> Yes!
>
>
>> Also we could have "config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN", too, and error out
>> if none or both are selected (can Kconfig error out?).
>
> We can error out in the Makefile, if there is consensus that we should
> be doing so.
>
OK, thanks. I have sent patch v3 for it, and did not check related error
in Kconfig files.
Please check the related patches (excuse me, I send the patch v3 only
according to "scripts/maintainers.pl", maybe not cc to you explicitly).
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists