lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:05:03 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill@...temov.name, lauraa@...eaurora.org, davej@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v4] warn on performance-impacting configs aka. TAINT_PERFORMANCE * Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> > > Changes from v3: > * remove vestiges of TAINT_PERFORMANCE > * change filename to check-configs > * fix typos in description > * print out CONFIG_FOO=y > * tone down warning message > * add KMEMCHECK and GCOV > * add PROVE_LOCKING, but keep LOCKDEP since _anything_ selecting > it will cause scalaing issues at least. But, move LOCKDEP > below LOCK_STAT and PROVE_LOCKING. > * no more perfo-mance (missing an 'r') > * temporary variable in lieu of multiple ARRAY_SIZE() > * break early out of snprintf() loop > > Changes from v2: > * remove tainting and stack track > * add debugfs file > * added a little text to guide folks who want to add more > options > > Changes from v1: > * remove schedstats > * add DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and SLUB_DEBUG_ON > > -- > > I have more than once myself been the victim of an accidentally- > enabled kernel config option being mistaken for a true > performance problem. > > I'm sure I've also taken profiles or performance measurements > and assumed they were real-world when really I was measuring the > performance with an option that nobody turns on in production. > > A warning like this late in boot will help remind folks when > these kinds of things are enabled. We can also teach tooling to > look for and capture /sys/kernel/debug/config_debug . > > As for the patch... > > I originally wanted this for CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but I think it also > applies to things like lockdep and slab debugging. See the patch > for the list of offending config options. I'm open to adding > more, but this seemed like a good list to start. > > The compiler is smart enough to really trim down the code when > the array is empty. An objdump -d looks like this: > > lib/check-configs.o: file format elf64-x86-64 > > Disassembly of section .init.text: > > 000000000000000 <check_configs>: > 0: 55 push %rbp > 1: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax > 3: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 6: 5d pop %rbp > 7: c3 retq > > This could be done with Kconfig and an #ifdef to save us 8 bytes > of text and the entry in the late_initcall() section. Doing it > this way lets us keep the list of these things in one spot, and > also gives us a convenient way to dump out the name of the > offending option. > > For anybody that *really* cares, I put the whole thing under > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL in the Makefile. > > The messages look like this: > > [ 3.865297] INFO: Be careful when using this kernel for performance measurement. > [ 3.868776] INFO: Potentially performance-altering options enabled: > [ 3.871558] CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y > [ 3.873326] CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> > Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com > Cc: tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org > Cc: kirill@...temov.name > Cc: lauraa@...eaurora.org > Cc: davej@...hat.com Looks good to me in principle. (haven't tested it) Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists