linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] pwm: lpss: use c99 initializers in structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:44:52 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	josh@...htriplett.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] pwm: lpss: use c99 initializers in structures

On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 01:20:25PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> 
> Use c99 initializers for structures.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @decl@
> identifier i1,fld;
> type T;
> field list[n] fs;
> @@
> 
> struct i1 {
>  fs
>  T fld;
>  ...};
> 
> @bad@
> identifier decl.i1,i2;
> expression e;
> initializer list[decl.n] is;
> @@
> 
> struct i1 i2 = { is,
> + .fld = e
> - e
>  ,...};
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> 
> ---
> The patches in this series do not depend on each other.
> 
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> index 4df994f..441a046 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo {
>  
>  /* BayTrail */
>  static const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo byt_info = {
> -	25000000
> +	.clk_rate = 25000000
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct pwm_lpss_chip *to_lpwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)

I've applied this patch to the for-next branch of the PWM tree. There
was a conflict due to a patch that was recently applied, but it was
trivial to fix it up, so I did.

Thanks,
Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped