[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140825094450.GC2399@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:44:52 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] pwm: lpss: use c99 initializers in structures
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 01:20:25PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Use c99 initializers for structures.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @decl@
> identifier i1,fld;
> type T;
> field list[n] fs;
> @@
>
> struct i1 {
> fs
> T fld;
> ...};
>
> @bad@
> identifier decl.i1,i2;
> expression e;
> initializer list[decl.n] is;
> @@
>
> struct i1 i2 = { is,
> + .fld = e
> - e
> ,...};
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> The patches in this series do not depend on each other.
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> index 4df994f..441a046 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo {
>
> /* BayTrail */
> static const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo byt_info = {
> - 25000000
> + .clk_rate = 25000000
> };
>
> static inline struct pwm_lpss_chip *to_lpwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
I've applied this patch to the for-next branch of the PWM tree. There
was a conflict due to a patch that was recently applied, but it was
trivial to fix it up, so I did.
Thanks,
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists