lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:30:55 +0200
From:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
CC:	Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: scsi logging future directions, was Re: [RFC PATCH -logging 00/10]
 scsi/constants: Output continuous error messages on trace

On 08/24/2014 10:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:39:59AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
>> If you trigger hundreds of errors (e.g., hot remove a device
>> during heavy IO), then all the prints to the linux serial console
>> bog down the system, causing timeouts in commands to other
>> devices and soft lockups for applications.
>>
>> Some changes that would help are:
>> 1. Put them under SCSI logging level control
>> 2. Use printk_ratelimited so an excessive number are trimmed
>>
>> Would you like to include something like this in your
>> patch set?
>
> I think we should come to an agreement where we want to go with scsi
> logging first before doing various smaller adjustments.  (Although your
> example is one that's urgent enough that I'd like to put it in ASAP,
> I had issues with it a few times).
>
> I had a chat with Martin at Linuxcon about these issues, and we were
> both in favor of getting rid of the old scsi logging mechansisms and
> instead replace it by an extended version of the scsi tracepoints that
> cover all places, and dump all data from the old logging mechanism
> that people find useful.
>
> In a few places we'd still want to log normal dev_printk style errors,
> and the I/O completion is one of them, even if they really need to be
> ratelimited and condensed.
>
> If someone has arguments in favour of keeping the old logging code
> I'd love to hear them, but in practive the traceevent code has huge
> benefits:
>
>   - almost zero overhead if disabled
>   - can easily be used without any tools through configs, but can be used
>     even better with tools like trace-cmd or perf
>   - allows both fine and coarse grained selections of events to trace
>   - allows to capture statistics on each trace point without event enabling the
>     output
>   - doesn't have any of the console lockup problems.
>
I've already been working on updating scsi logging infrastructure, 
removing old cludges and streamlining it.
I'm all in favour of moving things over to scsi tracing; in fact I've 
already moved all the current SCSI_ML_XXX statements to tracepoints in
my current patchset.

Unfortunately I haven't found time to test things out there, and there's 
the patchset from Yoshihiro which needs review and integration.

As of now I've treated this as rather low priority as no-one seemed to 
mind and the patchsets will be touching each and every driver.

I'll be updating the patchset and send it for review.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@...e.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ