[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1408973264-30384-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:27:36 +0200
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To: eric.auger@...com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
joel.schopp@....com, kim.phillips@...escale.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com,
a.rigo@...tualopensystems.com, john.liuli@...wei.com
Subject: [RFC 1/9] KVM: ARM: VGIC: fix multiple injection of level sensitive forwarded IRQ
Fix multiple injection of level sensitive forwarded IRQs.
With current code, the second injection fails since the state bitmaps
are not reset (process_maintenance is not called anymore).
New implementation consists in fully bypassing the vgic state
management for forwarded IRQ (checks are ignored in
vgic_update_irq_pending). This obviously assumes the forwarded IRQ is
injected from kernel side.
---
It was attempted to reset the states in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate, checking
the emptied LR of forwarded IRQ. However surprisingly this solution does
not seem to work. Some times, a new forwarded IRQ injection is observed
while the LR of the previous instance was not observed as empty.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 1 +
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 743020f..3da244f 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct vgic_dist {
unsigned long irq_pending_on_cpu;
struct rb_root irq_phys_map;
+ spinlock_t rb_tree_lock;
#endif
};
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 0007300..195c10c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -1517,14 +1517,18 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
int edge_triggered, level_triggered;
int enabled;
bool ret = true;
+ bool is_forwarded;
spin_lock(&dist->lock);
vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
+ is_forwarded = (vgic_get_phys_irq(vcpu, irq_num) >0);
+
edge_triggered = vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, irq_num);
level_triggered = !edge_triggered;
- if (!vgic_validate_injection(vcpu, irq_num, level)) {
+ if (!is_forwarded &&
+ !vgic_validate_injection(vcpu, irq_num, level)) {
ret = false;
goto out;
}
@@ -1557,7 +1561,8 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
goto out;
}
- if (level_triggered && vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq_num)) {
+ if (!is_forwarded &&
+ level_triggered && vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq_num)) {
/*
* Level interrupt in progress, will be picked up
* when EOId.
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists