[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53fb47c5.019c3c0a.6cdb.02e1@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:27:12 -0500
From: kodiak furr <boxerspam1@...il.com>
To: xiaoming wang <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / sleep: Asynchronous threads for dpm_complete
kodiak furr liked your message with Boxer for Android.
On Aug 25, 2014 10:13 AM, xiaoming wang <xiaoming.wang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> In analogy with commits 5af84b82701a and 97df8c12995,
> using asynchronous threads can improve the overall
> resume time significantly.
>
> This patch is for dpm_complete phase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: xiaoming wang <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index f9fe1b3..00c4bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -889,14 +889,15 @@ void dpm_resume(pm_message_t state)
> * @dev: Device to handle.
> * @state: PM transition of the system being carried out.
> */
> -static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> +static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state, bool async)
> {
> void (*callback)(struct device *) = NULL;
> char *info = NULL;
>
> if (dev->power.syscore)
> - return;
> + goto Complete;
>
> + dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
> device_lock(dev);
>
> if (dev->pm_domain) {
> @@ -928,6 +929,17 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> device_unlock(dev);
>
> pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +
> +Complete:
> + complete_all(&dev->power.completion);
> +}
> +
> +static void async_complete(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = (struct device *)data;
> +
> + device_complete(dev, pm_transition, true);
> + put_device(dev);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -940,27 +952,45 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> void dpm_complete(pm_message_t state)
> {
> struct list_head list;
> + struct device *dev;
>
> trace_suspend_resume(TPS("dpm_complete"), state.event, true);
> might_sleep();
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
> mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> + pm_transition = state;
> +
> + /*
> + * Advanced the async threads upfront,
> + * in case the starting of async threads is
> + * delayed by non-async resuming devices.
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &dpm_prepared_list, power.entry) {
> + reinit_completion(&dev->power.completion);
> + if (is_async(dev)) {
> + get_device(dev);
> + async_schedule(async_complete, dev);
> + }
> + }
> +
> while (!list_empty(&dpm_prepared_list)) {
> - struct device *dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
> + dev = to_device(dpm_prepared_list.prev);
>
> get_device(dev);
> dev->power.is_prepared = false;
> list_move(&dev->power.entry, &list);
> mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>
> - device_complete(dev, state);
> + if (!is_async(dev))
> + device_complete(dev, state, false);
>
> mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> put_device(dev);
> }
> list_splice(&list, &dpm_list);
> mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> + async_synchronize_full();
> trace_suspend_resume(TPS("dpm_complete"), state.event, false);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists