[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140825200215.6c0e900f@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:02:15 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Fejes József <jozsef.fejes@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stable@...r.kernel.org,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with commit: x86, iosf: Make IOSF driver modular and
usable by more drivers
> David, any other suggestions?
> Why can't the users of IOSF_MBI just select it? That's what many other
> drivers do when they need to be sure that some functionality is present.
I think the obvious problem is that most users of IOSF_MBI are
non-obvious and there will be many of them over time.
>
> I'm surprised that someone else (e.g. Linus) has not complained about the
> 'default m' for this driver.
That's certainly wrong, but drivers that use it should probably
auto-select it or we will get a billion bug reports asking why graphics
doesn't work etc
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists