[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuzB3zc86W4SUY-L3BDRPmzPOD+V7-jfzS7cTEbg74YOoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:07:11 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 06/29] bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate
methods to BPF maps
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>> 'maps' is a generic storage of different types for sharing data between kernel
>> and userspace.
>>
>> The maps are accessed from user space via BPF syscall, which has commands:
>>
>> - create a map with given type and attributes
>> fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, struct nlattr *attr, int len)
>> returns fd or negative error
>>
>> - lookup key in a given map referenced by fd
>> err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value)
>> returns zero and stores found elem into value or negative error
>>
>> - create or update key/value pair in a given map
>> err = bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value)
>> returns zero or negative error
>>
>> - find and delete element by key in a given map
>> err = bpf_map_delete_elem(int fd, void *key)
>>
>> - iterate map elements (based on input key return next_key)
>> err = bpf_map_get_next_key(int fd, void *key, void *next_key)
>
>
> I think you need to document the bpf() syscall instead of wrappers on it,
> from a developer's point of view. You will anyway need to document a new
> syscall with a man page as a general rule.
yep. I've mentioned before that man page is on todo list. I'm delaying
writing it, because it's the most difficult part and I don't want to keep
rewriting it when interface changes (like it did from global id to fd).
Once implementation lands, manpage will be the highest priority.
> In the changelog I mean something like:
>
> err = bpf(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM, ...);
Are you saying instead of:
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value)
write
err = bpf(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM, fd, key, value)
in commit log?
I think that style carries less information per line.
For man page I'll document the syscall in a traditional way, but
for commit log I like to have maximum info in the fewest lines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists