[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826084343.GA4417@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:43:43 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] DRBG: fix maximum value checks on 32 bit systems
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:29:45AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> The maximum values for additional input string or generated blocks is
> larger than 1<<32. To ensure a sensible value on 32 bit systems, return
> SIZE_MAX on 32 bit systems. This value is lower than the maximum
> allowed values defined in SP800-90A. The standard allow lower maximum
> values, but not larger values.
>
> SIZE_MAX - 1 is used for drbg_max_addtl to allow
> drbg_healthcheck_sanity to check the enforcement of the variable
> without wrapping.
This is really ugly but OK. However, I'm not sure how the sanity
check ever worked. It would appear that the drbg_generate call in
drbg_healthcheck_sanity should always fail because you explicitly
set addtl->len to drbg_max_addtl + 1, which should trigger the
"DRBG: additional information string too long" error, no?
Obviously it's working for you but I'd like to understand why
it's working and whether it'll continue to work.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists