[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826094619.GG17528@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:46:19 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" <arnout@...d.be>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tps65910: Work around silicon erratum SWCZ010
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:25:21AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:30:56PM +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) wrote:
> > > From http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/SWCZ010 :
> > >
> > > Glitch on SDA-SCL not managed correctly by the I2C IP
> drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > Applied, thanks.
> Eh?
So, this is an example of why it's important to both use subject lines
matching the pattern for the subsystem and try to select CC lists
sensibly. I've dropped the patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists