linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] mailbox: Add NVIDIA Tegra XUSB mailbox driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826102011.GA31124@ulmo>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:20:13 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] mailbox: Add NVIDIA Tegra XUSB mailbox driver

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:08:11 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > > > > > On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > >+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >+    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > > > > > >+    if (!res)
> > > > > > > >+            return -ENODEV;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Should devm_request_mem_region() be called here to claim the region?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >+    mbox->regs = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> > > > > > > >+                                      resource_size(res));
> > > > > > > >+    if (!mbox->regs)
> > > > > > > >+            return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Is _nocache required? I don't see other drivers using it. I assume there's
> > > > > > > nothing special about the mbox registers.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Most drivers should be using devm_ioremap_resource() which will use the
> > > > > > _nocache variant of devm_ioremap() when appropriate. Usually the region
> > > > > > will not be marked cacheable (IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE) and therefore be
> > > > > > remapped uncached.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Note that ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() are the same. We really shouldn't
> > > > > ever call ioremap_nocache().
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps we should remove ioremap_nocache() in that case. Or ioremap(),
> > > > really, and keep only those variants that do what they claim to do.
> > > 
> > > That would be good, but there are many instances of either one:
> > > 
> > > arnd@...rfel:/git/arm-soc$ git grep -w ioremap | wc
> > >    2156   13402  183732
> > > arnd@...rfel:/git/arm-soc$ git grep -w ioremap_nocache | wc
> > >     485    2529   42955
> > 
> > Ugh... nothing that I currently have time for. Perhaps this is a good
> > one for the Janitors? I'm not sure if the kernelnewbies.org TODO list is
> > still frequented since many pages seem to be very old. Is there some
> > other place where I could add this?
> 
> I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just
> remove all definitions of ioremap_nocache and add a wrapper to
> include/linux/io.h, to make it more obvious what is going on.

Yes, I suppose that would work too. I still think there's an advantage
in being explicit and avoid aliases like this. Perhaps a __deprecated
annotation would help with that?

> > > > > devm_ioremap_resource() and pci_iomap() checking for IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE is
> > > > > rather silly, since it doesn't call ioremap_cache() in that case.
> > > > 
> > > > Then that should be fixed.
> > > 
> > > Yes. I'd suggest we just ignore that flag and always call ioremap here.
> > > 
> > > When I checked this before, IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE only ever gets set for
> > > PCI ROM BARs, which we don't map into the kernel.
> > 
> > There's still a few users of ioremap_cache() around and they are
> > potential candidates for a conversion to devm_ioremap_resource(), so I
> > think it'd still make sense to keep the check.
> 
> Possibly. Note that these are all in architecture-specific code, as
> evidenced by the fact that we have multiple names for this function:
> 
> ioremap_cache:    arm, arm64, x86, ia64, sh
> ioremap_cached:   metag, unicore32
> ioremap_cachable: mips
> 
> All other architectures have none of the above.
> 
> An alternative approach would be to kill off IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE
> and introduce a devm_ioremap_resource_cache() helper when the first
> driver wants it.

Looking briefly at the involved headers and structure there seems to be
quite a bit of potential for cleanup.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped