[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826095444.5f2b2423@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:54:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Only export kvm_ple_window for x86_64
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:05:57 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> Il 26/08/2014 01:10, Steven Rostedt ha scritto:
> > Commit 7b46268d2954 "KVM: trace kvm_ple_window grow/shrink"
> > Added the tracepoint kvm_ple_window under a #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 but
> > left the export for that tracepoint unprotected, which would cause it
> > to fail to compile when X86_32 is set.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140825172204.769ab4e6@gandalf.local.home
> >
> > Reported-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
> > tested-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> The current KVM branch should have fixed this already---it leaves the
> tracepoint outside CONFIG_X86_64, which was the right thing to do in the
> first place.
>
Fair enough. I was wondering why this was unique to x86_64.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists