[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FDA463.8040704@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:26:59 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] dt: dependencies (for deterministic driver initialization
order based on the DT)
Am 27.08.2014 09:16, schrieb Alexander Holler:
> Why should I? I've posted patches along with a lot of comments and
> explanations, and e.g. you are just talking that it should be made like
> my patches already did. And others do talk too like my patches and the
> accompanying comments from me which explain most stuff never have
> existed and just repeat what the patches already do without refering to
> them.
Just to repeat myself:
These patches which started this thread are not just some ideas without
any sense for the amount of work necessary to implement them (as seen so
often).
These patches are real working code everyone can apply to the mentioned
kernel version and see what happens with his board. They are even
checkpatched to avoid bean counting discussion.
(Don't forget to use patch 10/9 too)
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists