[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FDF8DB.6050703@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:27:23 +0200
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ww-mutex: clarify help text for DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
On 27-08-14 17:19, Rob Clark wrote:
> We really don't want distro's enabling this in their kernels. Try and
> make that more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 07c2832..1b233fc 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -892,6 +892,10 @@ config DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
> the full mutex checks enabled with (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) this
> will test all possible w/w mutex interface abuse with the
> exception of simply not acquiring all the required locks.
> + Note that this feature can introduce significant overhead, so
> + it really should not be enabled in a production or distro kernel,
> + even a debug kernel. If you are a driver writer, enable it. If
> + you are a distro, do not.
>
> config DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> bool "Lock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live locks"
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists