linux-kernel - [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix ramc standby function registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:06:51 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix ramc standby function registration

After the for_each_matching_node loop, we end up with a null value for np. Then,
of_match_node() is not matching anything and we can't register the standby
function and "ramc no standby function available" is printed.

Fix that by selecting the first available standby function. For now,
at91_pm_set_standby doesn't support multiple different standby functions and no
existing SoCs have different RAM controllers.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
index 28ae63b8eb16..d2cade21ebd7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
@@ -343,25 +343,28 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 	int idx = 0;
+	const void *standby = NULL;
 
-	for_each_matching_node(np, ramc_ids) {
+	for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, ramc_ids, &of_id) {
 		at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
 		if (!at91_ramc_base[idx])
 			panic(pr_fmt("unable to map ramc[%d] cpu registers\n"), idx);
 
+		if (!standby)
+			standby = of_id->data;
+
 		idx++;
 	}
 
 	if (!idx)
 		panic(pr_fmt("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n"));
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
-	if (!of_id) {
+	if (!standby) {
 		pr_warn("ramc no standby function available\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
+	at91_pm_set_standby(standby);
 }
 
 void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/