[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FE1FE9.6070109@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:14:01 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] dt: dependencies (for deterministic driver initialization
order based on the DT)
Am 27.08.2014 19:52, schrieb Catalin Marinas:
>> Irrespective though, a new kernel needs to work against an old DT,
>
> I fully agree. But we shouldn't really extend the "old DT" statement to
> a new ARMv8 SoC ;).
Or any new v7 SoC. And even poor users of current ARM HW do want use
their HW. And they don't care if they have to change the DT if they
finally are able to use their board, which happens seldom enough. (I'm
not speaking about companies which are able to spend many man-years to
fix one kernel version for use with one specific HW).
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists