lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FE24C3.6080708@emulex.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:34:43 -0400
From:	James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
To:	Mike Qiu <qiudayu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Avoid to disable pci_dev twice

Mike,

Can you confirm - the "nulls" this patch correct are because the 
probe_one and error_detect threads are running concurrently, thus battling ?

If so - this fix looks insufficient and we should rework it.

Q: why are they allowed to run concurrently ?  I could see this solved 
at the platform level to let probe_one finish before error_detect is 
called (and therefore stating error_detect only makes sense to call if 
probe_one was successful). It's also a much driver-friendly solution. I 
could see other drivers have much the same issue with concurrency and 
data structure teardown - and if locks aren't allowed in the 
error-detect path... it's not good.

-- james s



On 7/31/2014 10:16 PM, Mike Qiu wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 02:32 PM, Mike Qiu wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all
>
> How about this patch ?
>
> Any idea ?
>
>> In IBM Power servers, when hardware error occurs during probe
>> state, EEH subsystem will call driver's error_detected interface,
>> which will call pci_disable_device(). But driver's probe function also
>> call pci_disable_device() in this situation.
>>
>> So pci_dev will be disabled twice:
>>
>> Device lpfc disabling already-disabled device
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: at drivers/pci/pci.c:1407
>> CPU: 0 PID: 8744 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G        W 
>> 3.10.42-2002.pkvm2_1_1.6.ppc64 #1
>> Workqueue: events .work_for_cpu_fn
>> task: c00000274e3f5400 ti: c0000027d3958000 task.ti: c0000027d3958000
>> NIP: c000000000471b8c LR: c000000000471b88 CTR: c00000000043ebe0
>> REGS: c0000027d395b650 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W 
>> (3.10.42-2002.pkvm2_1_1.6.ppc64)
>> MSR: 9000000100029032 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 28b52b44  XER: 
>> 20000000
>> CFAR: c000000000879ab8 SOFTE: 1
>> ...
>> NIP .pci_disable_device+0xcc/0xe0
>> LR  .pci_disable_device+0xc8/0xe0
>> Call Trace:
>> .pci_disable_device+0xc8/0xe0 (unreliable)
>> .lpfc_disable_pci_dev+0x50/0x80 [lpfc]
>> .lpfc_pci_probe_one+0x870/0x21a0 [lpfc]
>> .local_pci_probe+0x68/0xb0
>> .work_for_cpu_fn+0x38/0x60
>> .process_one_work+0x1a4/0x4d0
>> .worker_thread+0x37c/0x490
>> .kthread+0xf0/0x100
>> .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h      |  1 +
>>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 59 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> index 434e903..0c7bad9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ struct lpfc_hba {
>>   #define VPD_MASK            0xf         /* mask for any vpd data */
>>
>>       uint8_t soft_wwn_enable;
>> +    uint8_t probe_done;
>>
>>       struct timer_list fcp_poll_timer;
>>       struct timer_list eratt_poll;
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 
>> b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> index 06f9a5b..c2e67ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> @@ -9519,6 +9519,9 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one_s3(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> const struct pci_device_id *pid)
>>           }
>>       }
>>
>> +    /* Set the probe flag */
>> +    phba->probe_done = 1;
>> +
>>       /* Perform post initialization setup */
>>       lpfc_post_init_setup(phba);
>>
>> @@ -9795,6 +9798,9 @@ lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_recover(struct lpfc_hba 
>> *phba)
>>   static void
>>   lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>>   {
>> +    if (phba)
>> +        return;
>> +
>>       lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT,
>>               "2710 PCI channel disable preparing for reset\n");
>>
>> @@ -9812,7 +9818,8 @@ lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>>
>>       /* Disable interrupt and pci device */
>>       lpfc_sli_disable_intr(phba);
>> -    pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> +    if (phba->probe_done && phba->pcidev)
>> +        pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -10282,6 +10289,9 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> const struct pci_device_id *pid)
>>           goto out_disable_intr;
>>       }
>>
>> +    /* Set probe_done flag */
>> +    phba->probe_done = 1;
>> +
>>       /* Log the current active interrupt mode */
>>       phba->intr_mode = intr_mode;
>>       lpfc_log_intr_mode(phba, intr_mode);
>> @@ -10544,6 +10554,9 @@ lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_recover(struct 
>> lpfc_hba *phba)
>>   static void
>>   lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>>   {
>> +    if (!phba)
>> +        return;
>> +
>>       lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT,
>>               "2826 PCI channel disable preparing for reset\n");
>>
>> @@ -10562,7 +10575,9 @@ lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba 
>> *phba)
>>       /* Disable interrupt and pci device */
>>       lpfc_sli4_disable_intr(phba);
>>       lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(phba);
>> -    pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> +
>> +    if (phba->probe_done && phba->pcidev)
>> +        pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -10893,9 +10908,21 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
>>   lpfc_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t 
>> state)
>>   {
>>       struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> -    struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport 
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +    struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>>       pci_ers_result_t rc = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>
>> +    if (!shost)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> +         * Scsi_Host has not been created and We can do nothing
>> +         * in this state so call for hotplug*/
>> +        return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> +    phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> +    if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> +        return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>>       switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>>       case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>>           rc = lpfc_io_error_detected_s3(pdev, state);
>> @@ -10930,9 +10957,20 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
>>   lpfc_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> -    struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport 
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +    struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>>       pci_ers_result_t rc = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>
>> +    if (!shost)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> +         * Scsi_Host has not been created */
>> +        return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> +    phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> +    if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> +        return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>>       switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>>       case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>>           rc = lpfc_io_slot_reset_s3(pdev);
>> @@ -10963,7 +11001,18 @@ static void
>>   lpfc_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> -    struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport 
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +    struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>> +
>> +    if (!shost)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> +         * Scsi_Host has not been created */
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> +    if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> +        /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> +        return;
>>
>>       switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>>       case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ