[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FE24C3.6080708@emulex.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:34:43 -0400
From: James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
To: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Avoid to disable pci_dev twice
Mike,
Can you confirm - the "nulls" this patch correct are because the
probe_one and error_detect threads are running concurrently, thus battling ?
If so - this fix looks insufficient and we should rework it.
Q: why are they allowed to run concurrently ? I could see this solved
at the platform level to let probe_one finish before error_detect is
called (and therefore stating error_detect only makes sense to call if
probe_one was successful). It's also a much driver-friendly solution. I
could see other drivers have much the same issue with concurrency and
data structure teardown - and if locks aren't allowed in the
error-detect path... it's not good.
-- james s
On 7/31/2014 10:16 PM, Mike Qiu wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 02:32 PM, Mike Qiu wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all
>
> How about this patch ?
>
> Any idea ?
>
>> In IBM Power servers, when hardware error occurs during probe
>> state, EEH subsystem will call driver's error_detected interface,
>> which will call pci_disable_device(). But driver's probe function also
>> call pci_disable_device() in this situation.
>>
>> So pci_dev will be disabled twice:
>>
>> Device lpfc disabling already-disabled device
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: at drivers/pci/pci.c:1407
>> CPU: 0 PID: 8744 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G W
>> 3.10.42-2002.pkvm2_1_1.6.ppc64 #1
>> Workqueue: events .work_for_cpu_fn
>> task: c00000274e3f5400 ti: c0000027d3958000 task.ti: c0000027d3958000
>> NIP: c000000000471b8c LR: c000000000471b88 CTR: c00000000043ebe0
>> REGS: c0000027d395b650 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G W
>> (3.10.42-2002.pkvm2_1_1.6.ppc64)
>> MSR: 9000000100029032 <SF,HV,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28b52b44 XER:
>> 20000000
>> CFAR: c000000000879ab8 SOFTE: 1
>> ...
>> NIP .pci_disable_device+0xcc/0xe0
>> LR .pci_disable_device+0xc8/0xe0
>> Call Trace:
>> .pci_disable_device+0xc8/0xe0 (unreliable)
>> .lpfc_disable_pci_dev+0x50/0x80 [lpfc]
>> .lpfc_pci_probe_one+0x870/0x21a0 [lpfc]
>> .local_pci_probe+0x68/0xb0
>> .work_for_cpu_fn+0x38/0x60
>> .process_one_work+0x1a4/0x4d0
>> .worker_thread+0x37c/0x490
>> .kthread+0xf0/0x100
>> .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h | 1 +
>> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 59
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> index 434e903..0c7bad9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
>> @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ struct lpfc_hba {
>> #define VPD_MASK 0xf /* mask for any vpd data */
>>
>> uint8_t soft_wwn_enable;
>> + uint8_t probe_done;
>>
>> struct timer_list fcp_poll_timer;
>> struct timer_list eratt_poll;
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> index 06f9a5b..c2e67ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
>> @@ -9519,6 +9519,9 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one_s3(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> const struct pci_device_id *pid)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set the probe flag */
>> + phba->probe_done = 1;
>> +
>> /* Perform post initialization setup */
>> lpfc_post_init_setup(phba);
>>
>> @@ -9795,6 +9798,9 @@ lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_recover(struct lpfc_hba
>> *phba)
>> static void
>> lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>> {
>> + if (phba)
>> + return;
>> +
>> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT,
>> "2710 PCI channel disable preparing for reset\n");
>>
>> @@ -9812,7 +9818,8 @@ lpfc_sli_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>>
>> /* Disable interrupt and pci device */
>> lpfc_sli_disable_intr(phba);
>> - pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> + if (phba->probe_done && phba->pcidev)
>> + pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -10282,6 +10289,9 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> const struct pci_device_id *pid)
>> goto out_disable_intr;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set probe_done flag */
>> + phba->probe_done = 1;
>> +
>> /* Log the current active interrupt mode */
>> phba->intr_mode = intr_mode;
>> lpfc_log_intr_mode(phba, intr_mode);
>> @@ -10544,6 +10554,9 @@ lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_recover(struct
>> lpfc_hba *phba)
>> static void
>> lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>> {
>> + if (!phba)
>> + return;
>> +
>> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_INIT,
>> "2826 PCI channel disable preparing for reset\n");
>>
>> @@ -10562,7 +10575,9 @@ lpfc_sli4_prep_dev_for_reset(struct lpfc_hba
>> *phba)
>> /* Disable interrupt and pci device */
>> lpfc_sli4_disable_intr(phba);
>> lpfc_sli4_queue_destroy(phba);
>> - pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> +
>> + if (phba->probe_done && phba->pcidev)
>> + pci_disable_device(phba->pcidev);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -10893,9 +10908,21 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
>> lpfc_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_channel_state_t
>> state)
>> {
>> struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> + struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>> pci_ers_result_t rc = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>
>> + if (!shost)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> + * Scsi_Host has not been created and We can do nothing
>> + * in this state so call for hotplug*/
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> + phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> + if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>> case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>> rc = lpfc_io_error_detected_s3(pdev, state);
>> @@ -10930,9 +10957,20 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
>> lpfc_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> + struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>> pci_ers_result_t rc = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>
>> + if (!shost)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> + * Scsi_Host has not been created */
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> + phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> + if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>> +
>> switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>> case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>> rc = lpfc_io_slot_reset_s3(pdev);
>> @@ -10963,7 +11001,18 @@ static void
>> lpfc_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct Scsi_Host *shost = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - struct lpfc_hba *phba = ((struct lpfc_vport
>> *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> + struct lpfc_hba *phba;
>> +
>> + if (!shost)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state and
>> + * Scsi_Host has not been created */
>> + return;
>> +
>> + phba = ((struct lpfc_vport *)shost->hostdata)->phba;
>> +
>> + if (!phba || !phba->probe_done)
>> + /* Run here means it may during probe state */
>> + return;
>>
>> switch (phba->pci_dev_grp) {
>> case LPFC_PCI_DEV_LP:
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists