[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FE25EB.7060702@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:39:39 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max77802: set opmode to normal if off
is read from hw
On 27.08.2014 20:37, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:32:38PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 26.08.2014 13:37, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>>> + /*
>>> + * If the regulator is disabled and the system warm rebooted,
>>> + * the hardware reports OFF as the regulator operating mode.
>>> + * Default to operating mode NORMAL in that case.
>>> + */
>>> + if (val == MAX77802_OPMODE_OFF)
>>> + max77802->opmode[id] = MAX77802_OPMODE_NORMAL;
>>> + else
>>> + max77802->opmode[id] = val;
>
>> I might be missing something, but I believe I see a flaw here. If after
>> a cold boot opmode is something else than OFF or NORMAL, the kernel
>> starts, turns the regulator off and does warm reboot, the setting is
>> lost and the regulator is switched to NORMAL mode.
>
> That's essentially the situation the patch is trying to fix - if we boot
> and the regulator is off there's no way to figure out what the operating
> mode would have been so we have to pick something. If you've got an
> idea for something better to do...
>
Probably the only way to correctly handle this is to specify the right
operating mode in DT (after defining a binding for it).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists