lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:51:38 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>
Cc:	Bean Anderson <bean@...lsystems.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups

Hello,

Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?

And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before.
Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but
perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody
can do this.

Oleg.

 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c           |   16 +++++++++-------
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c        |    2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c        |    1 -
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ