[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140827130613.c8f6790093d279a447196f17@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:06:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:45:20 -0400 Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com> wrote:
> One of the primary uses for NV-DIMMs is to expose them as a block device
> and use a filesystem to store files on the NV-DIMM. While that works,
> it currently wastes memory and CPU time buffering the files in the page
> cache. We have support in ext2 for bypassing the page cache, but it
> has some races which are unfixable in the current design. This series
> of patches rewrite the underlying support, and add support for direct
> access to ext4.
Sat down to read all this but I'm finding it rather unwieldy - it's
just a great blob of code. Is there some overall
what-it-does-and-how-it-does-it roadmap?
Some explanation of why one would use ext4 instead of, say,
suitably-modified ramfs/tmpfs/rd/etc?
Performance testing results?
Carsten Otte wrote filemap_xip.c and may be a useful reviewer of this
work.
All the patch subjects violate Documentation/SubmittingPatches
section 15 ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists