linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops] Revert "powerpc: Replace __get_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140828074937.47020590@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:49:37 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops] Revert "powerpc: Replace
 __get_cpu_var uses"

Hi Christoph,

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:56:27 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > Chrisoph, let's route the updated patch through powerpc tree.
> 
> Ok. Once I figure out what went wrong. This went through Feng's build
> system and I though he did a powerpc build. So it must be a difference
> configuration on powerpc.

Were the patches tested on top of v3.17-rc1?  My build was a powerpc
ppc64_defconfig.  It is possible that some other change interacted with
this, but there are not many other arch/powerpc changes after v3.17-rc1
and none seem obvious.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)