linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] rcu: Some minor fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140827032018.GO2663@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:20:18 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] rcu: Some minor fixes and cleanups

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:10:10PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:09:37AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> This is a series of minor fixes and cleanup patches which I found while studying
> >> the code. All my previous pending (but not rejected ;) patches are superseded by
> >> this series, expect the rcutorture snprintf changes. I am still waiting for you
> >> to decide on that one :)
> >>
> >> These changes have been tested by the kvm rcutorture test setup. Some tests give
> >> me stall warnings, but otherwise have SUCCESS messages in the logs.
> >
> > For patches 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, and 13, once you get a Reviewed-by from one
> > of the co-maintainers or designated reviewers, I will queue them.
> > The other patches I have responded to.
> 
> Hi Paul, just a reminder so that these don't get forgotten :)

Hello, Pranith, haven't forgotten them, but also haven't seen any
reviews.

							Thanx, Paul

> >> Pranith Kumar (16):
> >>   rcu: Use rcu_num_nodes instead of NUM_RCU_NODES
> >>   rcu: Check return value for cpumask allocation
> >>   rcu: Fix comment for gp_state field values
> >>   rcu: Remove redundant check for an online CPU
> >>   rcu: Add noreturn attribute to boost kthread
> >>   rcu: Clear gp_flags only when actually starting new gp
> >>   rcu: Save and restore irq flags in rcu_gp_cleanup()
> >>   rcu: Clean up rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
> >>   rcu: Remove redundant check for online cpu
> >>   rcu: Check for RCU_FLAG_GP_INIT bit in gp_flags for spurious wakeup
> >>   rcu: Check for spurious wakeup using return value
> >>   rcu: Rename rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() to rcu_spawn_kthreads()
> >>   rcu: Spawn nocb kthreads from rcu_prepare_kthreads()
> >>   rcu: Remove redundant checks for rcu_scheduler_fully_active
> >>   rcu: Check for a nocb cpu before trying to spawn nocb threads
> >>   rcu: kvm.sh: Fix error when you pass --cpus argument
> >>
> >>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 42 ++++++++++++++-------------
> >>  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  4 +--
> >>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h                      | 40 +++++++++++++------------
> >>  tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh |  4 +--
> >>  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.0.0.rc2
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pranith
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/