linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] ftracetest: Initial commit for ftracetest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53FEEAF6.1030701@hitachi.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:40:22 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] ftracetest: Initial commit for ftracetest

(2014/08/28 0:54), Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Not really a complete review, but just 2 comments on this script:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:15:18AM +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> ...
>> +prlog() { # messages
>> +  echo $@ | tee -a $LOG_FILE
>> +}
>> +catlog() { #file
>> +  cat $1 | tee -a $LOG_FILE
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Testcase management
>> +PASSED_CASES=
>> +FAILED_CASES=
>> +CASENO=0
>> +testcase() { # testfile
>> +  CASENO=$((CASENO+1))
>> +  prlog -n "[$CASENO]"`grep "^#[ \t]*description:" $1 | cut -f2 -d:`
>> +}
>> +failed() {
>> +  prlog -e "\t[FAIL]"
>> +  FAILED_CASES="$FAILED_CASES $CASENO"
>> +}
>> +passed() {
>> +  prlog -e "\t[PASS]"
>> +  PASSED_CASES="$PASSED_CASES $CASENO"
>> +}
> 
> What I see here is a '-e' being echo'ed and not really a '-e' switch
> being used to 'echo'.  (Also, I'm not sure if this is a standard
> switch...).
> 
> This applies to all the other 'prlog -e'.

Oh, really? what shell did you use?
My target shell is the busybox and I've tested it on fedora20.

e.g. busybox echo command seems accept -e.
  $ busybox echo -e '\tfoo'
  	foo

Of course maybe I'd better not use \t, but "	"...


>> +
>> +
>> +# Run one test case
>> +run_test() { # testfile
>> +  local testname=`basename $1`
>> +  local testlog=`mktemp --tmpdir=$LOG_DIR ${testname}-XXXXXX.log`
>> +  testcase $1
>> +  echo "execute: "$1 > $testlog
>> +  (cd $TRACING_DIR; set -x ; source $t) >> $testlog 2>&1
>> +  ret=$?
> 
> I believe the usage of 'source' is a bashism, and '.' should be used
> instead.  In my environment, 'source' results in ret=127.  Replacing
> it by '.' fixes it.

Ah, right. I missed that, I'll fix that :)

Thank you,


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/