linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Optimize resource lookups for ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140827172128.93feef68.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:21:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	msalter@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Optimize resource lookups for ioremap

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:54:18 -0700 Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> > If we're still at 1+ hours then little bodges like this are nowhere
> > near sufficient and sterner stuff will be needed.
> > 
> > Do we actually need the test?  My googling turns up zero instances of
> > anyone reporting the "ioremap on RAM pfn" warning.
> 
> We get them more than we like, mostly from 3rd party vendors, and
> esp. those that merely port their windows drivers to linux.

Dang.  So wrapping the check in CONFIG_DEBUG_VM would be problematic?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/