[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FE8633.10305@amacapital.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:30:27 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs
On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I assume (because I wasn't told!) that there are two objectives here:
>
> 1) reduce memory consumption by not maintaining pagecache and
> 2) reduce CPU cost by avoiding the double-copies.
>
> These things are pretty easily quantified. And really they must be
> quantified as part of the developer testing, because if you find
> they've worsened then holy cow, what went wrong.
>
There are two more huge ones:
3) Writes via mmap are immediately durable (or at least they're durable
after a *very* lightweight flush).
4) No page faults ever once a page is writable (I hope -- I'm not sure
whether this series actually achieves that goal).
A note on #3: there is ongoing work to enable write-through memory for
things like this. Once that's done, then writes via mmap might actually
be synchronously durable, depending on chipset details.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists