lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:17:04 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <>, Theodore Ts'o <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>, kvm list <>,
	"" <>,
	Kees Cook <>, X86 ML <>,
	Daniel Borkmann <>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <>,
	Raghavendra K T <>,
	Bandan Das <>, Andrew Honig <>,
	KY Srinivasan <>,
	Haiyang Zhang <>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <>,
	Alok Kataria <>,
Subject: Re: GET_RNG_SEED hypercall ABI? (Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] random,x86,kvm:
 Rework arch RNG seeds and get some from kvm)

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:58:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> hpa pointed out that the ABI that I chose (an MSR from the KVM range
> and a KVM cpuid bit) is unnecessarily KVM-specific.  It would be nice
> to allocate an MSR that everyone involved can agree on and, rather
> than relying on a cpuid bit, just have the guest probe for the MSR.
CPUID part allows feature to be disabled for machine compatibility purpose
during migration. Of course interface can explicitly state that one successful
use of the MSR does not mean that next use will not result in a #GP, but that
doesn't sound very elegant and is different from any other MSR out there.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists