[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140828143243.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:32:43 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: rtg.canonical@...il.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: namespace: suppress 'may be used uninitialized'
warnings
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:55:49AM -0600, rtg.canonical@...il.com wrote:
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
>
> The gcc version 4.9.1 compiler complains even though it isn't possible for
> these variables to not get initialized before they are used.
Sigh... The root cause of that shite is that copy_mount_string() is too
convoluted for gcc (piss-poor) detection of uninitialized variables. And
yes, it is somewhat overcomplicated - it returns 0 or -E... *and* in former
case it returns NULL or a string as well, via a char ** argument.
The usual convention for such suckers is "return a pointer, using
ERR_PTR(-E...) to indicate an error". We have all of 4 (four) callers,
all in fs/*.c (and nobody else could see that function, unless they manually
included fs/internal.h).
So let's turn that into
char *copy_mount_string(const void __user *data)
{
return data ? strndup_user(data, PAGE_SIZE) : NULL;
}
and uses of that thing into
kernel_type = copy_mount_string(type);
ret = PTR_ERR(kernel_type);
if (IS_ERR(kernel_type))
goto out_type;
etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists