[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1409251097-26734-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:38:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a
separate rcu_sysidle_state variable. This commit therefore eliminates
rcu_preempt_state in favor of rcu_state_p.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 23 ++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index af01133dfd67..010f63ee6ee8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2690,16 +2690,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
-/*
- * Define RCU flavor that holds sysidle state. This needs to be the
- * most active flavor of RCU.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
-static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
-static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_sched_state;
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
-
static int full_sysidle_state; /* Current system-idle state. */
#define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT 0 /* Some CPU is not idle. */
#define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT 1 /* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
@@ -2841,7 +2831,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
* not the flavor of RCU that tracks sysidle state, or if this
* is an offline or the timekeeping CPU, nothing to do.
*/
- if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
+ if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_state_p ||
cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
return;
if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rdp->rsp))
@@ -2867,7 +2857,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
*/
static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
- return rsp == rcu_sysidle_state;
+ return rsp == rcu_state_p;
}
/*
@@ -2945,7 +2935,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_cancel(void)
static void rcu_sysidle_report(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
unsigned long maxj, bool gpkt)
{
- if (rsp != rcu_sysidle_state)
+ if (rsp != rcu_state_p)
return; /* Wrong flavor, ignore. */
if (gpkt && nr_cpu_ids <= CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL)
return; /* Running state machine from timekeeping CPU. */
@@ -3014,13 +3004,12 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
/* Scan all the CPUs looking for nonidle CPUs. */
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_sysidle_state->rda, cpu);
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda, cpu);
rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(rdp, &isidle, &maxj);
if (!isidle)
break;
}
- rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_sysidle_state,
- isidle, maxj, false);
+ rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_state_p, isidle, maxj, false);
oldrss = rss;
rss = ACCESS_ONCE(full_sysidle_state);
}
@@ -3047,7 +3036,7 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
* provided by the memory allocator.
*/
if (nr_cpu_ids > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL &&
- !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_sysidle_state) &&
+ !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_state_p) &&
!rsh.inuse && xchg(&rsh.inuse, 1) == 0)
call_rcu(&rsh.rh, rcu_sysidle_cb);
return false;
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists