[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54007B8A.50503@mm-sol.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:09:30 +0300
From: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"agross@...eaurora.org" <agross@...eaurora.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"iivanov@...sol.com" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add APQ8084 pinctrl support
On 08/29/2014 09:01 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 26 Aug 05:45 PDT 2014, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>
> Hi Georgi,
>
> Sorry for missing this before, but I did a quick walkthrough and unfortunately
> the gpio configuration needs a few updates.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c
> [...]
>> +
>> +#define PINGROUP(id, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7) \
>> + { \
>> + .name = "gpio" #id, \
>> + .pins = gpio##id##_pins, \
>> + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins), \
>> + .funcs = (int[]){ \
>> + APQ_MUX_gpio, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f1, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f2, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f3, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f4, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f5, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f6, \
>> + APQ_MUX_##f7 \
>> + }, \
>> + .nfuncs = 8, \
>> + .ctl_reg = 0x1000 + 0x10 * id, \
>> + .io_reg = 0x1004 + 0x10 * id, \
>> + .intr_cfg_reg = 0x1008 + 0x10 * id, \
>> + .intr_status_reg = 0x100c + 0x10 * id, \
>> + .intr_target_reg = 0x400 + 0x4 * id, \
>
> The routing of the interrupt is specified in TLMM_GPIO_INTR_CFG(n),
> i.e: 0x1008 + 0x10 * n
>
> Apparently the HW guys wanted to give us more work, so in 8084 they use 3 to
> specify routing the interrupts to KPSS, instead of the previous 4. So the
> static define of INTR_TARGET_PROC_APPS is no longer adequate.
>
> My suggestion is that you create an additional patch and add to your series
> that moves todays hardcoded 4 into the soc_data for the existing platforms (or
> include it in this struct).
>
>> + .mux_bit = 2, \
>> + .pull_bit = 0, \
>> + .drv_bit = 6, \
>> + .oe_bit = 9, \
>> + .in_bit = 0, \
>> + .out_bit = 1, \
>> + .intr_enable_bit = 0, \
>> + .intr_status_bit = 0, \
>> + .intr_ack_high = 1, \
>
> With the 8084 TLMM chip you ack the interrupt status by clearing this bit, so
> intr_ack_high should be 0.
>
>> + .intr_target_bit = 0, \
>
> Target bit is 5.
>
>> + .intr_raw_status_bit = 3, \
>
> Raw interrupt status bit is 4.
>
>> + .intr_polarity_bit = 1, \
>> + .intr_detection_bit = 2, \
>> + .intr_detection_width = 1, \
>
> You can do level, raise, fall and both edge detection with 8084, so the width
> of his part is 2.
>
>> + }
>> +
>
Thanks Bjorn. I'll search for some more information regarding this and will
update accordingly, including the INTR_TARGET_PROC_APPS for each platform.
Thanks again for your time!
BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists