[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140829150634.GF3330@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:06:34 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] perf tools: Add a test for tracking with
sched_switch
Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
> > not a requirement for this specific test.
> I will keep that in mind.
> > Applying!
> Thank you!
> AFAICT the other 20 patches still apply cleanly to your tree, so I am not
> going to send any more for now.
Ok, I'll try to process more of those, the db interface probably, after
I try using it for some simple tests.
About the PMU ones, that I would like to hear from other people dealing
with that area, like Jiri or even PeterZ, that IIRC discussed sysfs
interface aspects in the past, Jiri, Peter?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists