[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5400A1D5.705@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:52:53 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
tony@...mide.com, balbi@...com, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] tty: serial: 8250_dma: enqueue RX dma again on
completion.
On 08/18/2014 12:52 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
>> if (!up->dma || dma_err)
>> status = serial8250_rx_chars(up, status);
>> +
>> + if (dma_err && port->type == PORT_OMAP_16750)
>> + serial8250_rx_dma(up, 0);
>
> Can we stick to a 'has dma' flag and port->rx_dma() type usages so that
> we don't have to rewrite it again to add them the next slightly odd DMA
> user we add 8)
I hide this behind a bug flag, something like UART_NEEDS_DMA_RX_PENDING.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists