linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] Tidy up of modules using seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1409328400-18212-1-git-send-email-rob.jones@codethink.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:06:36 +0100
From:	Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, jbaron@...mai.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	penberg@...nel.org, mpm@...enic.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...ethink.co.uk, rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Tidy up of modules using seq_open()

Many modules use seq_open() when seq_open_private() or
__seq_open_private() would be more appropriate and result in
simpler, cleaner code.

This patch sequence changes those instances in IPC, MM and LIB.

Rob Jones (4):
  ipc: Use __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open()
  mm: Use seq_open_private() instead of seq_open()
  mm: Use __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open()
  lib: Use seq_open_private() instead of seq_open()

 ipc/util.c          |   20 ++++----------------
 lib/dynamic_debug.c |   17 ++---------------
 mm/slab.c           |   22 +++++++++-------------
 mm/vmalloc.c        |   20 +++++---------------
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/