[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5400C8C1.50504@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 21:38:57 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] perf tools: Add a test for tracking with sched_switch
On 29/08/2014 6:18 p.m., Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:52:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>>> On 08/20/2014 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>> But, for the current architecture, that should be just a clarification,
>>>> not a requirement for this specific test.
>>
>>> I will keep that in mind.
>>
>>>> Applying!
>>
>>> Thank you!
>>
>>> AFAICT the other 20 patches still apply cleanly to your tree, so I am not
>>> going to send any more for now.
>>
>> Ok, I'll try to process more of those, the db interface probably, after
>> I try using it for some simple tests.
>>
>> About the PMU ones, that I would like to hear from other people dealing
>> with that area, like Jiri or even PeterZ, that IIRC discussed sysfs
>> interface aspects in the past, Jiri, Peter?
>
> I reviewed those, but I remember not getting an answer
> for my question about that
> http://marc.info/?t=140533254600001&r=1&w=2
I guess I didn't understand what you meant. I will reply to that thread.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists