[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140829060059.GG12494@sonymobile.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:01:00 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"agross@...eaurora.org" <agross@...eaurora.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"iivanov@...sol.com" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add APQ8084 pinctrl support
On Tue 26 Aug 05:45 PDT 2014, Georgi Djakov wrote:
Hi Georgi,
Sorry for missing this before, but I did a quick walkthrough and unfortunately
the gpio configuration needs a few updates.
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c
[...]
> +
> +#define PINGROUP(id, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7) \
> + { \
> + .name = "gpio" #id, \
> + .pins = gpio##id##_pins, \
> + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins), \
> + .funcs = (int[]){ \
> + APQ_MUX_gpio, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f1, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f2, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f3, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f4, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f5, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f6, \
> + APQ_MUX_##f7 \
> + }, \
> + .nfuncs = 8, \
> + .ctl_reg = 0x1000 + 0x10 * id, \
> + .io_reg = 0x1004 + 0x10 * id, \
> + .intr_cfg_reg = 0x1008 + 0x10 * id, \
> + .intr_status_reg = 0x100c + 0x10 * id, \
> + .intr_target_reg = 0x400 + 0x4 * id, \
The routing of the interrupt is specified in TLMM_GPIO_INTR_CFG(n),
i.e: 0x1008 + 0x10 * n
Apparently the HW guys wanted to give us more work, so in 8084 they use 3 to
specify routing the interrupts to KPSS, instead of the previous 4. So the
static define of INTR_TARGET_PROC_APPS is no longer adequate.
My suggestion is that you create an additional patch and add to your series
that moves todays hardcoded 4 into the soc_data for the existing platforms (or
include it in this struct).
> + .mux_bit = 2, \
> + .pull_bit = 0, \
> + .drv_bit = 6, \
> + .oe_bit = 9, \
> + .in_bit = 0, \
> + .out_bit = 1, \
> + .intr_enable_bit = 0, \
> + .intr_status_bit = 0, \
> + .intr_ack_high = 1, \
With the 8084 TLMM chip you ack the interrupt status by clearing this bit, so
intr_ack_high should be 0.
> + .intr_target_bit = 0, \
Target bit is 5.
> + .intr_raw_status_bit = 3, \
Raw interrupt status bit is 4.
> + .intr_polarity_bit = 1, \
> + .intr_detection_bit = 2, \
> + .intr_detection_width = 1, \
You can do level, raise, fall and both edge detection with 8084, so the width
of his part is 2.
> + }
> +
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists