linux-kernel - Re: patch "staging: remove nokia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:49:41 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	cmroliv@...il.com, marcel@...tmann.org, pali.rohar@...il.com,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: patch "staging: remove nokia_hp4p driver

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:44:30AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > 
> > > What is going on here? I get flamed for not cleaning up the driver,
> > > because I cleaned it up before merging to -staging. Ok, so I did more
> > > cleanups, sent 3 cleanup patches, no reaction on those, and now I got
> > > a note that you are going to remove the driver...?
> > 
> > For the 3 "cleanup" patches, the first one was rejected and you said to
> > not include it, so I couldn't apply the others.
> 
> That was different series. I'm talking about:
> 
> [PATCH 1/3] staging: nokia_h4: switch to right types and use bdaddr_t
> [PATCH 2/3] staging: nokia_h4: avoid __uX types
> [PATCH 3/3] staging: use inlines where it makes sense
> 
> That is still valid and received no comments at all.

I didn't see those, were they mixed in with the previous ones?

> > > Please don't, I'd still like to clean the driver up and get included,
> > > as n900's are still under active use.
> > 
> > As the Bluetooth maintainer has said a number of times, he doesn't want
> > the driver in the tree as it is not doing the correct things.  It's been
> > a long time in the tree with no work on it at all, and I follow the
> > suggestions of the maintainers of the subsystems that staging drivers
> > follow.
> 
> You asked for more work and explained how easy it is to revert the
> removal.
> 
> I did more work, you ignored it, and are removing the driver, anyway.

Those 3 patches do nothing to address the issues that the bluetooth
maintainers have raised, right?

> > I suggest cleaning this up  in your own tree, and then just submitting it
> > for inclusion in the "normal" part of the kernel.  That way I'm not
> 
> ...creating a mess in the history, and fun merge problems for
> people actually using the driver :-(. And yes, n900 people actually
> are using it and have their own changes on top of it.

Look, the driver has been in my tree for a very long time with nothing
done on it.  The bluetooth maintainer has asked me to remove it as it
does not follow the proper api calls.  So I'll remove it.  It's a
staging driver, who cares about the "history" of it, just clean it up on
your own, and submit it to the bluetooth maintainers for inclusion in
the "real" part of the tree.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/