[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1409575968-5329-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:52:40 +0200
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To: eric.auger@...com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
joel.schopp@....com, kim.phillips@...escale.com, paulus@...ba.org,
gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com,
a.rigo@...tualopensystems.com, john.liuli@...wei.com
Subject: [RFC v2 1/9] KVM: ARM: VGIC: fix multiple injection of level sensitive forwarded IRQ
Fix multiple injection of level sensitive forwarded IRQs.
With current code, the second injection fails since the state bitmaps
are not reset (process_maintenance is not called anymore).
New implementation consists in fully bypassing the vgic state
management for forwarded IRQ (checks are ignored in
vgic_update_irq_pending). This obviously assumes the forwarded IRQ is
injected from kernel side.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
---
It was attempted to reset the states in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate, checking
the emptied LR of forwarded IRQ. However surprisingly this solution does
not seem to work. Some times, a new forwarded IRQ injection is observed
while the LR of the previous instance was not observed as empty.
v1 -> v2:
- fix vgic state bypass in vgic_queue_hwirq
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 0007300..8ef495b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -1259,7 +1259,9 @@ static bool vgic_queue_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
static bool vgic_queue_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
- if (vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq))
+ bool is_forwarded = (vgic_get_phys_irq(vcpu, irq) > 0);
+
+ if (vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq) && !is_forwarded)
return true; /* level interrupt, already queued */
if (vgic_queue_irq(vcpu, 0, irq)) {
@@ -1517,14 +1519,18 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
int edge_triggered, level_triggered;
int enabled;
bool ret = true;
+ bool is_forwarded;
spin_lock(&dist->lock);
vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
+ is_forwarded = (vgic_get_phys_irq(vcpu, irq_num) > 0);
+
edge_triggered = vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, irq_num);
level_triggered = !edge_triggered;
- if (!vgic_validate_injection(vcpu, irq_num, level)) {
+ if (!is_forwarded &&
+ !vgic_validate_injection(vcpu, irq_num, level)) {
ret = false;
goto out;
}
@@ -1557,7 +1563,8 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
goto out;
}
- if (level_triggered && vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq_num)) {
+ if (!is_forwarded &&
+ level_triggered && vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq_num)) {
/*
* Level interrupt in progress, will be picked up
* when EOId.
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists