[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCBOeLK-Z_96V_aAWBikS6tjrdYfj6_0w-9kSzQb=UJZsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:21:30 -0400
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: Wire up three syscalls
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Nice catch. We changed 'flags' from u64 to "unsigned int" in the last
> revision of the series. Patch looks good, but I'd prefer using
> "unsigned int" as type, instead of __u32. Just to be consistent with
> the syscall interface. The return type of F_GET_SEALS is actually
> "int" and the MSB is reserved for signed error codes, so you can
> savely use "int r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS, 0)" in
> mfd_assert_get_seals().
>
OK. Should I send a new patch with these changes or do you have one
line up already?
--
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists