[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140901153629.GA29938@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:36:29 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Cc: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise
module removal
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c 2014-08-26 13:24:51.646948507 -0400
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c 2014-08-30 18:04:54.589226679 -0400
> @@ -2743,6 +2743,13 @@ static int stop_queued_cmnd(struct scsi_
> if (test_bit(k, queued_in_use_bm)) {
> sqcp = &queued_arr[k];
> if (cmnd == sqcp->a_cmnd) {
> + devip = (struct sdebug_dev_info *)
> + cmnd->device->hostdata;
> + if (devip)
> + atomic_dec(&devip->num_in_q);
> + sqcp->a_cmnd = NULL;
Why would the hostdata every be NULL here? We should never
call ->slave_destroy on a device that has outstanding commands.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists