linux-kernel - [SMP BUG?] the return value of is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1409571334-2814-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:35:34 +0800
From:	Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
To:	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	<victor.kamensky@...aro.org>, <nico@...aro.org>,
	<ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, <cov@...eaurora.org>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [SMP BUG?] the return value of is_smp() is bug?

Hi,all

In kernel 3.17-rc2, when i set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP = y 
in .config file. the secondary core can not boot.

when i set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP = n in .config file,
the secondary core can boot.

But this does not happen in kernel 3.10 lts kernel, Whether the 
CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP is set yes or no ,the secondary core can boot.

Does the meaning of CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP changed or this is a bug in kernel 3.17-rc2 ? 

I write the following patch to test the return value of is_smp().

----------------------------------------

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 84db893d..fbeb67f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -925,6 +925,11 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	arm_dt_init_cpu_maps();
 	psci_init();
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	
+	if (is_smp() == 1)
+		printk("is_smp() return true;\n");
+	else if (is_smp() == 0)
+		printk("is_smp() return false;\n");
 	if (is_smp()) {
 		if (!mdesc->smp_init || !mdesc->smp_init()) {
 			if (psci_smp_available())

kernel version: 3.17-rc2

config:     set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP = y
command:    # qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -smp 2  -m 128M -kernel arch/arm/boot/zImage -nographic
The output:

..........
is_smp() return false;
CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
missing device node for CPU 0
CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Setting up static identity map for 0x604643d8 - 0x60464430
Brought up 1 CPUs
SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
...........

config:     set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and not set CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP 
command:    # qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -smp 2  -m 128M -kernel arch/arm/boot/zImage -nographic
The output:

.....
 Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
is_smp() return true;
sched_clock: 32 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 178956969942ns
......
......
CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
missing device node for CPU 0
missing device node for CPU 1
CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Setting up static identity map for 0x60463ef8 - 0x60463f50
CPU1: Booted secondary processor
CPU1: thread -1, cpu 1, socket 0, mpidr 80000001
Brought up 2 CPUs
SMP: Total of 2 processors activated.
CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
devtmpfs: initialized
.......

Any ideas?

-- 
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/