linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] block: loop: say goodby to bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOg+qYAh8fOSY9iHhWJOa9Jyg4FqfjwVxc20tgNUsxWfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:18:02 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] block: loop: say goodby to bio

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
<Elliott@...com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
>> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ming Lei
>> Sent: Saturday, 30 August, 2014 11:08 AM
>> To: Jens Axboe; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Dave Kleikamp
>> Cc: Zach Brown; Christoph Hellwig; Maxim Patlasov; Ming Lei
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] block: loop: say goodby to bio
> ...
>> -static int do_bio_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct bio
>> *bio)
>> +static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request
>> *rq)
>>  {
>>       loff_t pos;
>>       int ret;
>>
>> -     pos = ((loff_t) bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9) + lo->lo_offset;
>> +     pos = ((loff_t) blk_rq_pos(rq) << 9) + lo->lo_offset;
>>
>> -     if (bio_rw(bio) == WRITE) {
>> +     if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE) {
>>               struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
>>
>> -             if (bio->bi_rw & REQ_FLUSH) {
>> +             if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) {
>>                       ret = vfs_fsync(file, 0);
>>                       if (unlikely(ret && ret != -EINVAL)) {
>>                               ret = -EIO;
>> @@ -436,7 +439,7 @@ static int do_bio_filebacked(struct loop_device
>> *lo, struct bio *bio)
>>                * encryption is enabled, because it may give an attacker
>>                * useful information.
>>                */
>> -             if (bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD) {
>> +             if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
>>                       struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
>>                       int mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE |
>> FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
>
> Can a REQ_WRITE_SAME make it through to here?

It can't because loop doesn't support WRITE_SAME.


Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/