linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/super.c: do not shrink fs slab during direct memory reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:03:27 +0800
From:	Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@...wei.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
	Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/super.c: do not shrink fs slab during direct memory
 reclaim

Hi, Dave
On 2014/9/2 7:51, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 05:57:22PM +0800, Xue jiufei wrote:
>> The patch trys to solve one deadlock problem caused by cluster
>> fs, like ocfs2. And the problem may happen at least in the below
>> situations:
>> 1)Receiving a connect message from other nodes, node queues a
>> work_struct o2net_listen_work.
>> 2)o2net_wq processes this work and calls sock_alloc() to allocate
>> memory for a new socket.
>> 3)It would do direct memory reclaim when available memory is not
>> enough and trigger the inode cleanup. That inode being cleaned up
>> is happened to be ocfs2 inode, so call evict()->ocfs2_evict_inode()
>> ->ocfs2_drop_lock()->dlmunlock()->o2net_send_message_vec(),
>> and wait for the unlock response from master.
>> 4)tcp layer received the response, call o2net_data_ready() and
>> queue sc_rx_work, waiting o2net_wq to process this work.
>> 5)o2net_wq is a single thread workqueue, it process the work one by
>> one. Right now it is still doing o2net_listen_work and cannot handle
>> sc_rx_work. so we deadlock.
>>
>> It is impossible to set GFP_NOFS for memory allocation in sock_alloc().
>> So we use PF_FSTRANS to avoid the task reentering filesystem when
>> available memory is not enough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@...wei.com>
> 
> For the second time: use memalloc_noio_save/memalloc_noio_restore.
> And please put a great big comment in the code explaining why you
> need to do this special thing with memory reclaim flags.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
Thanks for your reply. But I am afraid that memalloc_noio_save/
memalloc_noio_restore can not solve my problem. __GFP_IO is cleared
if PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set and can avoid doing IO in direct memory
reclaim. However, __GFP_FS is still set that can not avoid pruning
dcache and icache in memory allocation, resulting in the deadlock I
described.

Thanks.
XueJiufei



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/