[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409020857110.9201@gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:07:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Commit 532d0d0690d1 ("irqchips: Replace __this_cpu_ptr uses")
> incorrectly converted *__this_cpu_ptr() to raw_cpu_read() instead
> of *raw_cpu_ptr(). Fix it.
Oww.. This is double indirection deal there. A percpu offset pointing to
a pointer?
Generally the following is true (definition from
include/asm-generic/percpu.h that is used for ARM for raw_cpu_read):
#define raw_cpu_read_4(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
> Index: b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c 2014-09-02 14:03:41.026758653 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c 2014-09-02 14:37:04.466811546 +0200
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX
> #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> {
> - return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base);
> + return *raw_cpu_ptr(base->percpu_base);
> }
>
> static void __iomem *gic_get_common_base(union gic_base *base)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists