[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5405E612.9030402@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:45:22 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
CC: Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Alan Bowens <Alan.Bowens@...el.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] atmel_mxt_ts - device tree, bootloader, etc
On 07/29/2014 01:26 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 11:06 AM, Nick Dyer wrote:
>> On 29/07/14 17:16, Stephen Warren wrote:
...
>>> I also found that removing the module (even without attempting a FW
>>> update) yields:
>>>
>>> After attempted FW update via sysfs:
>>>
>>>> root@...alhost:~# rmmod ./atmel_mxt_ts.ko
>>>> [ 81.995672] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>>>> virtual address 00000364
>>
>> Not good. It's trying to free an input device which isn't registered at
>> that point. In a later patch in my series I add a guard around that
>> (mxt_free_input_device):
>> https://github.com/ndyer/linux/commit/bb4800ff8c185
>
> It looks like 8d01a84b86b0 "Input: atmel_mxt_ts - implement T100 touch
> object support" from that branch is what solves the issue.
>
> Ah, in linux-next, it's simply a double-unregister; both mxt_remove()
> and mxt_free_object_table() call
> input_unregister_device(data->input_dev). I think it would make sense to
> send the following patch for 3.17. Do you agree?
Nick, I see the fix below isn't in linux-next as of next-20140829. IIRC,
you'd sent the patch below but there had been some comments on it by
Dmitry. Unfortunately, I don't recall the patch subject to search for
it. Anyway, are you planning on re-spinning the patch so it can be applied?
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> index 03b85711cb70..da497dbf9735 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> @@ -1353,8 +1353,10 @@ static int mxt_get_info(struct mxt_data *data)
>
> static void mxt_free_object_table(struct mxt_data *data)
> {
> - input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> - data->input_dev = NULL;
> + if (data->input_dev) {
> + input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> + data->input_dev = NULL;
> + }
>
> kfree(data->object_table);
> data->object_table = NULL;
> @@ -2194,7 +2196,6 @@ static int mxt_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_attr_group);
> free_irq(data->irq, data);
> - input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> mxt_free_object_table(data);
> kfree(data);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists