[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140901.202632.1784070145688270115.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com
Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
jszhang@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] net: mvberlin_eth: add an Ethernet driver for
Marvell Berlin
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:50:59 +0200
> +struct rx_desc {
> + u16 buf_size; /* Buffer size */
> + u16 byte_cnt; /* Descriptor buffer byte count */
...
> + u16 byte_cnt; /* buffer byte count */
> + u16 l4i_chk; /* CPU provided TCP checksum */
I'm really suspcious that you're ordering these two members differently
than that used by the mv643xx_eth driver.
Looking at a diff of the two drivers, most of the transmit and recieve paths
are largely the same.
WRT. register differences, adding indirection to handle that is a no-brainer
because the cost of the register access itself will absolutely dwarf whatever
it costs to do an indirect call or whatever to implement the register access.
I really think you should look into sharing code more seriously.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists