[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54060105.5070707@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:40:21 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: add cpu_device_create to support per-cpu
devices
Hi Greg,
On 02/09/14 18:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:22:07PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 22/08/14 12:29, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new function to create per-cpu devices.
>>> This helps in:
>>> 1. reusing the device infrastructure to create any cpu related
>>> attributes and corresponding sysfs instead of creating and
>>> dealing with raw kobjects directly
>>> 2. retaining the legacy path(/sys/devices/system/cpu/..) to support
>>> existing sysfs ABI
>>> 3. avoiding to create links in the bus directory pointing to the
>>> device as there would be per-cpu instance of these devices with
>>> the same name since dev->bus is not populated to cpu_sysbus on
>>> purpose
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/base/cpu.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/cpu.h | 4 ++++
>>> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> Here is the alternate solution I could come up with instead of
>>> creating cpu class. cpu_device_create is very similar to
>>> device_create_groups_vargs w/o class support, but I could not
>>> reuse anything else to avoid creating similar function.
>>>
>>> Let me know your thoughts/suggestions on this.
>>>
>>
>> Any feedback on this ? If ok, I will respin cacheinfo series removing
>> cpu class creation with this patch.
>
> Please address the issues others have already raised.
>
If you meant issues raised on cacheinfo series, I have addressed them
already in v3(raised by you, Stephen Boyd, Mark and Russell). I have
retained hotplug notifiers which Stephen wanted to remove as I don't
know if that's acceptable on all the architectures.
I posted this single patch as a replacement to the patch creating cpu
class as Kay and David suggested that we can't have class and bus with
same name.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists