[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1409681487.26422.1.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:11:27 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:04 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> > I definitely don't have a problem cleaning this up in net-next. I wanted
> > a minimal patch for stable because I didn't check history where and when
> > additional users of dev_get_by_flags_rcu were removed.
>
> `git grep` should show you we only have one caller. Apparently we don't
> care about any out-of-tree module.
Point is : you did not check if some stable versions had more callers.
Its very nice you checked current version, but it is not enough for a
stable candidate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists