[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VdvPbpgLMZXZ0ADg8KxtqQPo5C8ismgbVnfxd7Oina7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:20:58 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
zhangqing <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>, xxx <xxx@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] regulator: RK808: Remove pdata from the regulator
Chris,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v7:
> - remove pdata struct from header file, add rk808_regulator struct
>
> Changes in v6:
> - remove the redundant code
>
> Changes in v5:
> - re-edit base on Mark's branch
>
> Changes in v4:
> - use &client->dev replace rk808->dev
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> Adviced by Mark Browm:
> - change of_find_node_by_name to find_child_by_name
> - use RK808_NUM_REGULATORS as the name of the constant
> - create a pdata when missing platform data
> - use the rk808_reg name to supply_regulator name
> - replace regulator_register with devm_regulator_register
> - some other problem with coding style
>
> drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 52 ++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> index 0d11df1..4d543a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> @@ -3,9 +3,6 @@
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> *
> - * Author: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> - * Author: Zhang Qing <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> - *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> @@ -14,28 +11,25 @@
> * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> * more details.
> - *
> */
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> -#include <linux/err.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/rk808.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
> -#include <linux/regmap.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -/*
> - * Field Definitions.
> - */
> +
> +/* Field Definitions */
> #define RK808_BUCK_VSEL_MASK 0x3f
> #define RK808_BUCK4_VSEL_MASK 0xf
> #define RK808_LDO_VSEL_MASK 0x1f
>
> +struct rk808_regulator {
> + struct regulator_init_data *rk808_init_data[RK808_NUM_REGULATORS];
> + struct device_node *of_node[RK808_NUM_REGULATORS];
> +};
> +
> static const int buck_set_vol_base_addr[] = {
> RK808_BUCK1_ON_VSEL_REG,
> RK808_BUCK2_ON_VSEL_REG,
> @@ -50,10 +44,6 @@ static const int buck_contr_base_addr[] = {
> RK808_BUCK4_CONFIG_REG,
> };
>
> -#define rk808_BUCK_SET_VOL_REG(x) (buck_set_vol_base_addr[x])
> -#define rk808_BUCK_CONTR_REG(x) (buck_contr_base_addr[x])
> -#define rk808_LDO_SET_VOL_REG(x) (ldo_set_vol_base_addr[x])
> -
> static const int ldo_set_vol_base_addr[] = {
> RK808_LDO1_ON_VSEL_REG,
> RK808_LDO2_ON_VSEL_REG,
> @@ -65,9 +55,7 @@ static const int ldo_set_vol_base_addr[] = {
> RK808_LDO8_ON_VSEL_REG,
> };
>
> -/*
> - * rk808 voltage number
> - */
> +/* rk808 voltage number */
> static const struct regulator_linear_range rk808_buck_voltage_ranges[] = {
> REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(700000, 0, 63, 12500),
> };
> @@ -295,7 +283,7 @@ static struct of_regulator_match rk808_reg_matches[] = {
> };
>
> static int rk808_regulator_dts(struct i2c_client *client,
> - struct rk808_board *pdata)
> + struct rk808_regulator *rk808_regulator)
> {
> struct device_node *np, *reg_np;
> int i, ret;
> @@ -323,8 +311,9 @@ static int rk808_regulator_dts(struct i2c_client *client,
> !rk808_reg_matches[i].of_node)
> continue;
>
> - pdata->rk808_init_data[i] = rk808_reg_matches[i].init_data;
> - pdata->of_node[i] = rk808_reg_matches[i].of_node;
> + rk808_regulator->rk808_init_data[i] =
> + rk808_reg_matches[i].init_data;
> + rk808_regulator->of_node[i] = rk808_reg_matches[i].of_node;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -334,26 +323,25 @@ static int rk808_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct rk808 *rk808 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> struct i2c_client *client = rk808->i2c;
> - struct rk808_board *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> + struct rk808_regulator *rk808_regulator;
> struct regulator_config config = {};
> struct regulator_dev *rk808_rdev;
> struct regulator_init_data *reg_data;
> int i = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!pdata) {
> - pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pdata)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> + rk808_regulator = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rk808_regulator),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rk808_regulator)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Totally remove rk808_regulator_dts() function. Totally remove
"rk808_regulator" local variable (and allocation, and typedef). Then
you can just use "rk808_reg_matches" in the "for" loop in your probe
function, right? You're going to get rid of a ton of code...
Remember, you can also remove the check about "client->dev.of_node".
You depend on OF... Also it appears that "of_regulator_match" prints
an error for you in at least the common error case, so I think you can
get rid of "failed to parse regulator data: %d\n" printout.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists