linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netlink: Safer deletion of sk_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140901.220325.955861172520355423.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Sep 2014 22:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	HarishJennyKN <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, tgraf@...g.ch, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	darkjames-ws@...kjames.pl, rgb@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: Safer deletion of sk_bind_node

From: Harish Jenny K N
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:38:29 +0530

Firstly, you really need to fix your outgoing email so that your email
address appears in your From: header properly.

> From: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> 
>     Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
>         (netlink_release+0x0/0x2a0) from [<8034e78c>] (sock_release+0x28/0xa4)
>         (sock_release+0x0/0xa4) from [<8034e830>] (sock_close+0x28/0x34)
>         (sock_close+0x0/0x34) from [<800f3490>] (__fput+0xf0/0x1ec)
>         (__fput+0x0/0x1ec) from [<800f3634>] (____fput+0x10/0x14)
>         (____fput+0x0/0x14) from [<80040a64>] (task_work_run+0xb8/0xd8)
>         (task_work_run+0x0/0xd8) from [<800113a0>] (do_work_pending+0xb0/0xc4)
>         (do_work_pending+0x0/0xc4) from [<8000d960>] (work_pending+0xc/0x20)
>     Call flow of the inline and static functions
>         netlink_release
>         -----netlink_remove
>         ---------__sk_del_bind_node
>         --------------__hlist_del
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>

This doesn't tell us anything about how this situation can be
arrived at.

When subscriptions changes, we delete the node with the table lock
held if subscriptions goes to zero.  We only try to delete the node
when subscriptions was zero.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/