[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540641F6.1050504@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:17:26 -0400
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] Revert "serial: uart: add hw flow control support
configuration"
On 09/02/2014 05:58 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 05:50 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> On 09/02/2014 05:39 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> Finally, this patch
>>> supposes to fix existing bugs in the serial core for auto CTS-enabled
>>> hardware, but does not include the class of hardware for which these
>>> bugs exist.
>>
>> What is this? What class of hardware are you referring to?
>
> UART_CAP_AFE and UART_CAP_EFR hardware.
>
>> As discussed, I will send an updated patch for this as discussed..
>
> Great.
>
> And since that patch will touch every single line this reverts (and more)
> with a different solution, I see no reason not to back this out.
>
No Issues and I am fine with the revert.
> Plus, as you can see, you're holding up progress.
I need to make progress on the hardware that I deal with for which this
patch was submitted :) Unfortunately this patch didn't get proper review
before merge causing the issue. Just want to give right context.
Regards,
Murali
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists