linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/12] MIPS: GIC: Move MIPS_GIC_IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:22:31 -0700
From:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Jeffrey Deans <jeffrey.deans@...tec.com>,
	Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] MIPS: GIC: Move MIPS_GIC_IRQ_BASE into platform irq.h

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Sunday 31 August 2014 11:54:04 Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>> > On Friday 29 August 2014 15:14:31 Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>> >> Define a generic MIPS_GIC_IRQ_BASE which is suitable for Malta and
>>> >> the upcoming Danube board in <mach-generic/irq.h>.  Since Sead-3 is
>>> >> different and uses a MIPS_GIC_IRQ_BASE equal to the CPU IRQ base (0),
>>> >> define its MIPS_GIC_IRQ_BASE in <mach-sead3/irq.h>.
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Why do you actually have to hardwire an IRQ base? Can't you move
>>> > to the linear irqdomain code for DT based MIPS systems yet?
>>>
>>> Neither Malta nor SEAD-3 use device-tree for interrupts yet, so they
>>> still require a hard-coded IRQ base.  For boards using device-tree, I
>>> stuck with a legacy IRQ domain as it allows most of the existing GIC
>>> irqchip code to be reused.
>>
>> I see. Note that we now have irq_domain_add_simple(), which should
>> do the right think in either case: use a legacy domain when a
>> nonzero base is provided for the old boards, but use the simple
>> domain when probed from DT without an irq base.
>>
>> This makes the latter case more memory efficient (it avoids
>> allocating the irq descriptors for every possibly but unused
>> IRQ number) and helps ensure that you don't accidentally rely
>> on hardcoded IRQ numbers for the DT based machines, which would
>> be considered a bug.
>
> Ah, ok.  It looks like add_simple() is what I want then.

Actually, never mind.  To re-use the existing GIC irqchip code I want
a legacy IRQ domain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/